Chamisa’s MPs express concerns about their welfare

20

IN THE latest twist to the drama playing out within the MDC, it has emerged that many party legislators are not in favour of the push by Nelson Chamisa and his top allies for them to “disengage” from Parliament with immediate effect.
Part recordings of the party’s parliamentary caucus meeting that was held at Morgan Richard Tsvangirai (MRT) House in Harare on Monday, which were availed to the Daily News yesterday by some of the disgruntled legislators, show that there is significant aversion to the Chamisa directive.

All this comes as the Thokozani Khupe-led group that is temporarily in charge of the MDC, following the recent Supreme Court ruling, has warned that it will recall more legislators from Parliament if any of them continue to dally with Chamisa.

It also comes as the government has warned MDC legislators that should they choose to withdraw from the National Assembly, authorities will withdraw all their perks, including their top-of-the-range vehicles, with immediate effect.

Some of the aggrieved MDC MPs who spoke to the Daily News yesterday confirmed the authenticity of the recordings, adding that many legislators had told Chamisa’s allies that they would not abide by the directive to “disengage” from Parliament.

“Many MPs openly raised concern about their welfare. Some actually said they had used their own resources to campaign and cannot, therefore, just be told to leave Parliament.

“One MP told (Tendai) Biti (who presided over the parliamentary caucus meeting at MRT House) that most church members do not follow a pastor when he is transferred to another city, but rather remain at their branch.

“This MP (name given but withheld) was implying that party members and MPs should not be forced to follow Chamisa,” one of the MPs who attended the heated meeting told the Daily News.

“Why shouldn’t I go to Parliament? I will not do that because I have so much to lose and they (Chamisa and his top allies) have little to lose. I have loans that have to be settled.
“Who will help me to pay these loans, and where will I get that money?” another party legislator, a proportional representative, said.

Another MP who spoke to the Daily News said they had told Chamisa’s allies who attended the Monday meeting that they were misleading the charismatic politician – whom they also accused of rushing to announce the legislators’ “withdrawal” from Parliament without consulting them first.

“Most MPs asked why Chamisa was refusing to attend the (planned July 31) extraordinary congress as per the Supreme Court judgment.

“His (Chamisa’s) team failed to give a convincing answer, with one of them saying something to the effect that most court judgments were against Chamisa all the time, and so they could not follow them.

“The only answer they seemed to have was that the courts were captured, but they did not say why they keep going back to the same captured courts,” the MP said.

“Only a few MPs such as Joana (Mamombe), Virginia (Muradzikwa) and Shakespeare (Hamauswa) supported the disengagement order (from Parliament), with the majority clear that they were not about to leave the National Assembly,” another legislator told the Daily News.

On his part Hamauswa insisted that the MPs who attended Monday’s meeting all wanted to withdraw from Parliament.

“The MPs were given a platform to express their views and fears as per the threats from the rebels.

“The MPs were clear on that. They will follow the decision of the party and … not surrender the people’s project to Zanu-PF.

“In solidarity with the four MPs who were wrongfully withdrawn from Parliament, the MPs agreed to disengage from Parliament pending the conclusion of the ongoing consultation processes,” Hamauswa said.

“The members of Parliament also agreed to be involved in the ongoing consultation processes with the structures and the general electorate.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here