By
Shiwen Yap
Africa-Press – Eritrea. In 2017, as India’s digital market cooled from its startup frenzy, Chinese internet giants like Tencent, Alibaba, and Baidu saw opportunity where others saw risk. As detailed in a Founding Fuel article, “2017: The year of the Chinese internet bounty hunters,” these firms deployed strategic minority stakes, cultural savvy, and ecosystem-building to outmaneuver Western competitors like Amazon and Uber. They didn’t just invest; they integrated, creating resilient footholds in a mobile-first, price-sensitive market.
Fast forward to July 2025, and the global artificial intelligence (AI) landscape mirrors that moment—a high-stakes race where U.S. tech titans like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon face fierce competition from Europe’s sovereign EuroStack, led by Qwant and Ecosia’s privacy-first search index, and China’s AI powerhouses.
By emulating China’s 2017 playbook—taking minority stakes in regional AI startups, building integrated ecosystems, fortifying defensive moats, and navigating international regulations—U.S. firms can dominate the AI frontier while offering tailored “stacks” to rival EuroStack’s vision. Here’s how they can seize this moment.
The Chinese Blueprint: Lessons from 2017 India
The Founding Fuel article painted a vivid picture: Chinese firms, battle-hardened by their cutthroat domestic market, saw India’s 2017 digital slowdown as a chance to invest strategically. With an estimated $30 billion opportunity, they took minority stakes in local players like Flipkart, leveraging partnerships with investors like SoftBank to scale rapidly.
Their edge? Deep understanding of India’s mobile-first, bargain-hunter consumers and a cautious approach to cultural and operational risks. This wasn’t about domination but integration—building ecosystems that resonated locally while amplifying global reach.
Chinese enterprises have forged distinct corporate ecosystems that differ significantly in structure, innovation approaches, and cultural influences from those of the US. Chinese ecosystems often emphasize strong relationships, hierarchy, and government influence, while US ecosystems tend to focus on open innovation, individual achievement, and market-driven competition.
This is linked to how business ecosystems globally have changed, with the innovation ecosystem’s achievements of China coming to the fore in recent years. That being said, while it offers lessons for the global community, the achievements of China’s corporate and innovation ecosystems must be taken into context. At this stage, the business ecosystems of Chinese AI enterprises advantage them over their US counterparts.
China’s state-driven Digital Silk Road (DSR) offers a powerful strategic lever for accelerating the global expansion of its private AI firms. By financing digital infrastructure—5G networks, data centers, subsea cables—and facilitating e-commerce and cloud platforms in dozens of countries, China lowers market entry barriers and creates fertile ground for AI startups to deploy their technologies overseas (eastasiaforum.org).
Under the DSR framework, private companies such as DeepSeek and Alibaba benefit from state-backed subsidies, infrastructure contracts, and standard-setting processes that enable their models and platforms to scale rapidly across developing markets.
This synergy between public infrastructure export and private-sector innovation enables Chinese AI firms to build early commercial traction, set global norms on emerging technologies, and increase their influence in digital ecosystems across Africa, Asia, and the Middle East much more rapidly than they could domestically.
This advantage is also at work in today’s AI market, where across sectors, the involution and overcapacity present across different sectors in China—AI and technology among them—are evolving into cross-border phenomena that US companies have to account for.
Valued at $200 billion in 2025 and projected to hit $1 trillion by 2030, according to Statista, AI is fragmented by regional priorities—Europe’s privacy focus, Asia’s affordability demands, and Africa’s infrastructure gaps. US firms, often criticized for monopolistic tendencies, face a choice: repeat past mistakes of overconfidence or adopt China’s nuanced strategy to win globally.
Minority Stakes: A Low-Risk, High-Reward Strategy
In 2017, Chinese firms avoided the pitfalls of full acquisitions, opting for minority stakes to gain market access without overextending resources. Tencent’s investment in Flipkart, for instance, gave it a foothold in India’s e-commerce boom without the burden of operational control. US tech firms can apply this to AI by targeting startups in high-growth regions.
Consider Europe and its AI ecosystem, where startups like France’s Mistral AI and Germany’s Aleph Alpha are challenging U.S. dominance with open-source, privacy-focused models. US tech major Microsoft already acquired a minority stake in French AI firm Mistral in 2024. This was part of a move to integrate its language models with Azure’s cloud infrastructure. This move provides access to Europe’s talent pool and GDPR-compliant frameworks, sidestepping the regulatory scrutiny faced by full acquisitions under the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA).
Beyond Europe, Southeast Asia offers fertile ground. Indonesia’s GoTo, a tech conglomerate, is investing in AI for logistics and fintech. A minority stake by Amazon could pair its AWS AI tools with GoTo’s local data, optimizing supply chains for a region with 700 million consumers. In Africa, startups like Nigeria’s InstaDeep, acquired by BioNTech in 2023, show AI’s potential in healthcare. Google could invest in similar ventures, blending its DeepMind expertise with local genomic data to address diseases like malaria, gaining goodwill and market share.
Why does a minority stake approach work? They reduce financial risk and regulatory backlash and can potentially yield outsize financial returns in the long run, as seen with SoftBank’s $20 million Alibaba investment yielding $58 billion. They also foster collaboration, allowing U.S. firms to learn from local innovators while injecting capital and technology. This aligns with the ECIPE report’s call for international partnerships (i.e., US-Europe corporate collaborations) and multi-cloud strategies to counter EuroStack’s “Buy European” push, ensuring mutual benefits over zero-sum competition.
Building Integrated AI Ecosystems
The success of Chinese Internet majors in India’s e-commerce space in the 2010s hinged on understanding the mobile-first ecosystem and tailoring solutions to local needs. US firms can build AI ecosystems by integrating their strengths—cloud computing and advanced algorithms—with regional innovations. This creates “stacks” that compete with EuroStack, which combines AI, cloud, and chips to deliver sovereign, privacy-first solutions.
Consider the collaboration between search engine providers Qwant and Ecosia to establish the European Search Perspective, launched in November 2024. This exemplifies a regional stack. With 20 million monthly users, Ecosia’s eco-friendly search and Qwant’s privacy focus are meant to challenge Google’s 90% market share in Europe. Their index, offering localized results in French and German, aligns with the EU’s Federated Data Exchange, ensuring GDPR compliance.
US firms can counter with their own stacks. For instance, Amazon could partner with Qwant to develop a “Privacy Stack,” integrating AWS’s AI analytics with Qwant’s tracking-free search. This stack would appeal to European businesses wary of data surveillance, offering a competitive alternative to EuroStack’s closed ecosystem. In India, a “Value Stack” could combine Google’s lightweight Gemini models with vernacular AI from startups like Vernacular.ai, targeting India’s 1.4 billion consumers, 70% of whom prefer non-English interfaces (*Deloitte*).
Integrated ecosystems also amplify scalability. By embedding US AI tools into local platforms—connecting Microsoft’s Copilot with a Southeast Asian e-commerce app—firms create sticky, interdependent systems. This mirrors Tencent’s WeChat ecosystem, which blended payments, messaging, and services to dominate China. For U.S. firms, ecosystems reduce reliance on single-point solutions, ensuring resilience against competitors like China’s Baidu, whose Ernie AI model rivals ChatGPT in Asia.
Fortifying Defensive Moats
Chinese firms in India partnered with investors like SoftBank and Naspers to scale while mitigating risks. US tech firms can build defensive moats through strategic alliances, shielding against geopolitical and regulatory threats. A CEPA report warns of Europe’s fears of US data weaponization, driving EuroStack’s sovereignty push. US firms must counter this perception.
This can be done through building strategic partnerships and business alliances. Partnering with local cloud providers like Germany’s Ionos or France’s OVHcloud, as ECIPE suggests, can reassure European regulators. Microsoft’s 2024 deal with OVHcloud to host Azure in Europe shows how such partnerships localize data, easing DMA concerns. Similarly, a stake in Ecosia could position a U.S. firm as a collaborator, not a monopolist, leveraging Ecosia’s sustainability ethos to appeal to eco-conscious consumers.
A key dimension to consider is accounting for geopolitical defenses. In Asia, where China’s AI firms face US sanctions and local digital sovereignty concerns, American companies can partner with neutral players like Singapore’s Temasek Holdings to invest in regional AI startups. This deflects accusations of imperialism while securing supply chains for AI chips, critical amid US-China tensions. In Africa, collaborations with governments on AI for public services—like Kenya’s digital ID program—can build trust and counter Chinese influence, which dominates through Huawei’s infrastructure investments.
The other component to consider is talent moats. The AI talent war is fierce, with India producing 20% of global AI researchers, according to the Stanford AI Index. U.S. firms can emulate China’s talent acquisition by funding AI research hubs in Bangalore or Lagos, ensuring a pipeline of innovators. This strengthens their moat against EuroStack’s push for European talent retention (*CEPS*).
Navigating International Regulations
Chinese tech enterprises cautious navigation of India’s cultural and operational risks in the late 2010s offers a lesson for US firms facing 2025’s regulatory maze worldwide. The EU’s AI Act, effective August 2025, imposes strict rules on high-risk AI systems, with fines up to €35 million. The DMA forces gatekeepers like Google to offer choice screens, boosting Qwant and Ecosia’s visibility. U.S. firms must embed compliance into their strategies.
To comply with the AI Act, US firms can develop transparent AI models in the form of open-weight or open-source versions of proprietary models, publishing risk assessments as mandated. Partnering with Qwant to integrate its privacy-first index ensures GDPR compliance, avoiding penalties. In China, where data localization laws are stringent, Amazon could collaborate with local cloud providers like Alibaba Cloud, hosting AI models in-country to meet regulatory demands.
Beyond compliance, US firms must address ethical concerns like AI bias and fairness, which EuroStack emphasizes. By investing in startups focused on ethical AI (e.g., Anthropic’s safe AI research), US firms can align with global values, countering EuroStack’s narrative of US tech as extractive. This also appeals to consumers, 60% of whom prioritize ethical AI, per a 2025 Edelman survey.
What’s key is offering diverse AI stacks for consumers in a fragmented global market. For instance, EuroStack’s Qwant-Ecosia partnership delivers a privacy-first, localized search stack, challenging U.S. dominance. U.S. firms can respond with tailored stacks for diverse markets:
Privacy Stack (Europe): Google could integrate its AI with Qwant’s index, offering a GDPR-compliant search and analytics platform for European SMEs. This competes with EuroStack’s cloud-AI-chip ecosystem while respecting sovereignty.
Value Stack (Emerging Markets): In India or Africa, Microsoft could deploy lightweight AI models on Azure, paired with local startups’ vernacular or agriculture-focused AI, targeting cost-conscious users. This mirrors China’s bargain-hunter focus in 2017.
Enterprise Stack (Global): Amazon’s AWS could offer a B2B stack combining AI, IoT, and analytics, integrating with local IoT firms in Japan or Brazil to serve industries like manufacturing.
These stacks, like EuroStack’s interoperable model, prioritize modularity, allowing users to mix and match components. A freemium model, inspired by xAI’s Grok 3, could offer free AI tools with premium upgrades, capturing market share in price-sensitive regions.
That said, there are a number of challenges and risks for US enterprises. Emulating the strategy of Chinese AI enterprises isn’t without hurdles. Regulatory missteps could trigger fines or bans, as seen with Meta’s €1.2 billion GDPR fine in 2023.
Overreliance on minority stakes risks diluted influence if local management pursues a strategic pivot, which was a key motive for Walmart to establish a majority stake in India’s Flipkart. Similarly, geopolitical tensions, particularly with China, could restrict U.S. firms’ access to Asian markets. Finally, EuroStack’s government-backed momentum due to its alignment with the EU’s Digital International Strategy and the potential integration of a ‘tech citizenship’ strategy could outpace US efforts if partnerships lag.
Roadmap for U.S. Tech Titans
To win the AI race, US firms should:
Invest Strategically: Take 10-20% stakes in AI startups in Europe, Asia, and Africa, focusing on sectors like healthcare, logistics, and education.
Build Ecosystems: Integrate U.S. AI tools with local platforms, creating modular stacks for privacy, value, and enterprise needs.
Partner Wisely: Ally with local cloud providers, governments, and VCs to ensure compliance and trust.
Prioritize Ethics: Embed fairness and transparency into AI models to align with global values.
Scale Freemium Models: Offer free AI tools with premium tiers, capturing diverse consumer segments.
To secure long-term AI leadership, U.S. tech firms must look beyond Silicon Valley and embrace a multipolar strategy. This means not just exporting technology but embedding themselves into the growth narratives of emerging markets—where the next billion users, datasets, and innovations will emerge.
The Chinese playbook in India in the late 2010s—smart stakes, integrated ecosystems, and cultural nuance—underscored the power of early positioning, local partnerships, and ecosystem thinking. Today, with EuroStack offering a sovereign alternative and Beijing-backed platforms accelerating their reach, the race is no longer about who builds the smartest models but who integrates them most effectively across diverse digital terrains.
Failure to adapt risks more than lost market share—it risks strategic irrelevance in the defining technological contest of the 21st century. U.S. firms must seize this geopolitical moment, wield capital with intent, align AI systems with local norms, and scale access responsibly. The AI frontier is still open—but only to those bold enough to localize, partner, and lead with purpose.
moderndiplomacy
For More News And Analysis About Eritrea Follow Africa-Press
