By
Partha Roy
Africa-Press – Lesotho. With the internet age, artificial intelligence (AI) is a leading-edge tool in education that offers resources that are claimed to yield customized learning, instant feedback, and efficient school management. AI systems are able to monitor the performance of students at high school level in real-time, provide them with personal guidance, and even predict knowledge gaps before they become major hurdles. These technologies are surely useful, particularly in high school education systems with mammoth teacher-to-student ratio levels where adequate one-on-one attention is out of the question. The application of AI, however, in the learning process has its two sides. Over-reliance on AI, especially as a source of answers or solutions, risks lopping off the intellectual skills education is intended to develop—creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving, and intellectual curiosity.
While AI can be a potent tool of implementation, education’s main task is the development of human intellect. It is human intellect that invents, tests assumptions, and innovates. The danger is that AI will substitute these processes rather than complement them. As students utilize machines to discover answers, they will eventually forget the mental work associated with developing ideas independently. It would have disastrous social implications, reducing the potential for innovative research and innovation, the principal impellers of improvement for any knowledge-based economy.
The Cognitive Implications of AI in Education
AI integration into pedagogies has streamlined many operations—be it grading and administrative work, or learning software that adapts the content based on student performance. But this convenience can, in a way, divert students’ focus away from the important cognitive processes. Not being able to solve a problem, considering alternative solutions, and even making mistakes is essential in deep learning. When used to excess as a bypass, AI whisks away these learning moments and may cause what psychologists and educators have referred to as “cognitive atrophy.”
The human brain, or grey matter, thrives on challenge and active participation. Too much reliance on AI technology has the potential to short circuit these capacities in the long term. Students may be able to utilize technology in adequate working condition but fail to acquire the internal reasoning capabilities necessary for independent thought. That is, they are capable of solving answers but not problem-solving. This is a good differentiation since knowledge devoid of problem-solving capacity stifles innovation. In a world where computers can process information faster than humans, the ability to think critically, synthesize, and produce new ideas is a uniquely human capital.
Global Literacy Trends: Progress and Challenges
The significance of being active mentally is emphasized once more in the background of world trends in literacy. UNESCO’s computation of 87.4% world adult literacy rate for all of the world as of 2023, consisting of 90.0% males and 82.7% females, shows there has been unparalleled advancement in world literacy over time(UNESCO Institute for Statistics). But there is tremendous diversity by region as well as by gender behind these summary statistics.
Sub-Saharan Africa, for example, is one of the lowest in the world in literacy levels, with adult literacy rates of less than 50% in many countries. These disparities are more than mere abstractions—indeed, they constitute structural disadvantage in access to quality schooling, long-term poverty, and sociocultural disadvantage, especially for girls and women. These kinds of imbalances, while less pronounced, occur in some parts of South and Central Asia. Even here, in these largely literate countries of Europe and North America, an over-reliance on electronic resources and artificial intelligence assistance with minimal focus on critical thinking may increasingly steer educational results away from profound learning toward superficial knowledge gain.
The international trends regarding literacy suggest a major point that technology may open doors towards learning more but cannot, on its own, provide equal or substantial outcomes in terms of learning. Literacy based on the capacity to read and write does not necessarily guarantee the establishment of higher-order thinking capabilities. It is further compounded by this over-reliance on AI as well, particularly where the initial years of schooling are of poor quality.
Population Growth and the Need for Inclusive Education
Population growth actually multiplies the challenges. Between 2013 and 2023, the population of the world rose from about 7.1 billion to more than 8 billion. This expansion puts a huge burden on schools, teaching resources, and policy infrastructures. In these circumstances, AI has organic advantages: it can scale up individualized learning, offer instant feedback, and maximize resource use. These benefits are not universal, however. It has restricted accessibility in developing and poor nations since it reflects a present digital divide that might further hinder the disadvantaged students.
This inequality is so disfavoured that it creates a system whereby achievement at school becomes more a matter of access to technology than of intellectual capacity or genius. Policy initiatives being instituted with regularity and spending on hardware infrastructure, this inequality might very well be a stationary aspect of world schooling, one that preserves disparity instead of doing away with it.
The Risk of Social Stratification
Plugging AI in selectively into schools can have the impact of stratifying society. The persons included within intricate AI systems will prosper, both online and intellectually in terms of knowledge acquisition. Persons excluded from such arrangements will be left behind, not because of lack of skill but because of organizational disadvantage within education. In the long term, this digital stratification can snowball into economic and social stratification, guaranteeing privilege and exclusion cycles.
Education can be a proper leveller, but uninhibited AI development may precisely become a means of increasing inequality. That would be a distortion of the egalitarian and social justice values where education is determined by availability and not by human potential.
The Imperative of Human-Centric AI Development
To stay away from such pitfalls, AI needs to be designed and implemented in an anthropocentric manner. Instructional technology has to assist, rather than substitute, intellectual effort. Thus, one needs to develop systems that encourage problem-solving, creativity, and ethical thought as much as scaffolding instead of definitive answers.
Closing the digital gap is just as important. Spending in infrastructure, teacher professionalisation, and policy investment can make AI-based tools available to all. Highlighting equality, we can leverage AI to aid students from varying socio-economic backgrounds, instead of widening the education gaps.
Closing Reflection
AI has so much to contribute to learning but in its advantage rest gargantuan reservations. Relying on AI comes at the expense of intellectual growth, students having tools but not intellectual capabilities to think and dream creatively independently. The 87.4% literacy of the world, inspiring as it is, does not preclude disparities in learning, and AI in unrestricted use can further deepen the same.
The question is how to achieve a balance: to use AI to speed up learning without jeopardizing the building of critical thinking, imagination, and human creativity. Only thus can education continue to be a force for empowerment, equity, and social change, with technological innovation assisting but not replacing the human mind.
moderndiplomacy
For More News And Analysis About Lesotho Follow Africa-Press
