Africa-Press – Mauritius. The resignation of Roshi Bhadain, totally useless and grotesque moreover, will provoke a no less absurd partial. As a result, our analysts, disoriented by this burlesque situation, find themselves forced and forced to rack their brains to “analyze” and find something intelligent to narrate.
And they finally managed to dig up the shooting angle. This is followed by contortions and pedaling in the semolina. Hats off though. Just for their magnificent effort we will hang on and try to follow.
This angle is Machiavellianism. Which of the two main leaders, Navin Ramgoolam and Paul Bérenger, is the most Machiavellian? And for the others, don’t worry, it will come time for the neurons to pause.
From the appointment of Arvin Boolell as Labor candidate, we rush to the diabolical calculations of Navin Ramgoolam. Thus Arvin Boolell would be sent to the slaughterhouse with the dark intention of eliminating him from the race for the leadership of the PTr.
Easy as pie. However, in the process these same specialists in the electoral grub erect Arvin Boolell as the big favorite of this partial. So, on the contrary, a victory for Arvin Boolell would leave Navin Ramgoolam.
But then: if Navin Ramgoolam was so Machiavellian as that, would he have taken the risk of nominating Arvin Boolell as a candidate? You follow ? Me, I admit that I have trouble getting it.
But hey, these seasoned analysts have still found, without laughing, the parade in a breathtaking coaster-pedaling exercise. Thus the diabolical Navin Ramgoolam would have chosen Arvin Boolell to win, to then appropriate the victory.
You can not make that up. In any case, it makes you dizzy. Paul Bérenger would be even more Machiavellian, according to these excellent political scientists. A little reminder: this Machiavellianism that sticks to his skin did not prevent him from collecting electoral bowls. Even without pans.
Finally, by designating an unknown person and supporting her like the noose with the hanged man, Paul Bérenger would not have committed one of his enormous blunders of which he has the secret, but it is indeed a clever calculation, always according to our brilliant political scientists.
Thus this choice would respond to the deep desire of Paul Bérenger to facilitate the victory of Arvin Boolell to then slum with a PTr rid of Navin Ramgoolam.
But, hold on tight, at the same time the same people tell us that the “MMM-MSM Remake” is in the making. Well then ! As for Xavier Duval, no in-depth analysis has been made on the participation of the PMSD, to date. Its weight is certainly considered negligible.
Still that… The fact remains that what will certainly fuel the deep analyzes of Machiavellianism from each other is the designation by Xavier Duval of a candidate, certainly “Macronian on the move”, but far from being a big size of the blue family.
Is it so as not to bother the MMM too much given the porosity of their traditional electorate? But, between us, I’m not sure that Paul Bérenger is particularly delighted with this noble initiative, he who would bet on a purple defeat as brilliantly explained by our analysts.
And Pravind Jugnauth in all this shit? No scholarly commentary on his Machiavellian talent has yet emerged. It is true that in the state of discomfiture in which the Alliance Lepep, made up of odds and ends, finds itself, one cannot imagine for a single second Lepep playing a leading role during this consultation.
Besides, Ivan Collendavelloo – not so terrible as that – has just declared that they will have a participation “in their own way”. that is a formula that will certainly excite the neurons of our commentators who will struggle like beautiful “devils” to attach a fruitful Machiavellianism to Pravind Jugnauth.
“Participating in their own way”: is it a question of favoring one or the other “big” camp? But nagging dilemma: help “one way” or another Arvin Boolell to eliminate Navin Ramgoolam, objective set by the MSM for ages? Especially since a defeat of the MMM would place the MSM in a strong position for a “MMM-MSM Remake”? But the problem is that it would suit Paul Bérenger’s business for the reasons given by our excellent observers.
The MSM, therefore, could say goodbye to the “Remake” and to power. Another option for the MSM: favor the MMM candidate hoping for the defeat of Arvin Boolell. Navin Ramgoolam would therefore remain at the head of the PTr, thereby ruling out an MMM-PTr alliance.
But it is not won for all that for a “Remake” because the MMM revived by the victory of a young novice woman would it not be tempted by the Macronian style – (they too, decidedly) – and go alone to the next legislative? Not easy.
For More News And Analysis About Mauritius Follow Africa-Press
