Dr.Mohamed A. Fouad
Africa-Press – Mozambique. In economic policy discourse, numbers are presumed to speak truth. GDP growth, poverty rates, unemployment figures, and fiscal balances are the dashboards of modern governance—objective metrics designed to inform planning and enable accountability. Yet numbers can mislead. When indicators become ends in themselves—targets to hit rather than phenomena to understand—they risk distorting the very systems they were intended to measure. This phenomenon is encapsulated in Campbell’s Law, a principle with urgent relevance in today’s data-driven world.
When Measures Lose Their Meaning
Formulated in 1976 by sociologist Donald T. Campbell, Campbell’s Law cautions, “The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor.” This insight is mirrored in Goodhart’s Law—coined by economist Charles Goodhart: “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.” Together, these principles underscore a central governance risk: metrics, once tied to performance evaluations or political incentives, become prone to manipulation and misrepresentation.
Metrics Under Pressure: The Egyptian Experience
Egypt offers a stark case study of this phenomenon. Several headline economic indicators, while nominally sound, have drifted from empirical reality. This divergence threatens both policy integrity and public trust.
1. Poverty Data Withheld: Since 2020, Egypt has not released updated poverty statistics, despite significant economic volatility driven by inflation, subsidy cuts, and currency devaluation. The absence of updated figures hinders evidence-based policy responses, particularly as the government scales up its social protection programs.
2. Unemployment and Hidden Labor Slack: Official unemployment remains around 7%, but this figure—aligned with ILO standards—excludes discouraged job seekers and underemployed individuals. With over 50% of non-agricultural workers in the informal economy, the true labor slack is underestimated. Furthermore, the lack of regional and gender disaggregation obscures critical policy gaps, particularly in youth employment.
3. The Hollow Primary Surplus: Egyptian fiscal policy emphasizes the achievement of a primary surplus—revenues minus expenditures before interest payments. However, with debt service consuming nearly 60% of total revenues, this measure offers limited insight into actual fiscal sustainability. In a high-debt environment, the primary surplus is an incomplete metric, often masking deeper structural vulnerabilities.
When Metrics Reproduce, Not Resolve, Dysfunction
These measurement distortions have real-world consequences. Institutions lose credibility, and policy becomes reactive rather than proactive. The emphasis on performance optics over substantive results creates a veneer of progress—reform in form but not in function.
This dynamic is not confined to public governance. In my work on customer experience (CX) transformation, I encounter similar distortions in the private sector. Metrics such as resolution rates or post-interaction satisfaction are frequently omitted or selectively interpreted, not for lack of capacity but to manage perception. Measurement becomes a reputational defense mechanism, not a management tool. The link to public governance is clear: when the act of measuring becomes politicized, institutions fall into strategic myopia—optimizing for the metric, not the mission.
Global Echoes of Metric Manipulation
This is not an Egyptian anomaly. Around the globe, public and private actors have manipulated metrics to serve narrative objectives:
– India (2019): The government delayed the release of labor survey data revealing a 45-year high in unemployment, coinciding with national elections.
– China: Local governments inflated GDP figures to meet performance targets, prompting Beijing to centralize statistical oversight.
– United States (2008): Credit rating agencies, compromised by conflicts of interest, inflated risk assessments of mortgage-backed securities. This contributed directly to the financial crisis.
In each instance, metrics—originally tools for guidance—became instruments of distortion, reinforcing the governance risks that Campbell identified nearly five decades ago.
Indicators as Institutions
Metrics are more than data points. They are institutional artifacts that shape incentives, allocate capital, and define strategic direction. When compromised, they don’t merely fail—they mislead, often with compounding consequences. Apparent success becomes a performance theater masking structural fragility.
Amartya Sen, Nobel laureate economist, argued that access to reliable, timely data is central to democratic accountability. His work with Jean Drèze in India advanced the role of decentralized data collection and social audits in strengthening policy responsiveness. Their legacy underscores a vital point: data integrity is not a technical challenge—it is a democratic imperative. Measurement must be designed to empower, not obfuscate.
Restoring Measurement Integrity
To mitigate the distortions warned of by Campbell and Goodhart, governments and organizations must reinstate epistemic discipline. Three principles are foundational:
1. Statistical Independence: Data agencies must operate free from political interference. Release schedules and methodologies should be codified and public.
2. Multi-Dimensional Indicators: Single metrics rarely capture complex realities. Composite indicators—such as labor underutilization indices or fiscal risk dashboards—offer more nuanced guidance.
3. Transparent Revisions: Adjustments to datasets should be publicly justified and archived. Openness about revisions reinforces trust in the data ecosystem.
Conclusion: Numbers Are Tools, Not Shields
Metrics should reflect—not manufacture—reality. The role of measurement is not to validate political narratives but to inform corrective action. Egypt, like many nations, faces a pivotal choice: pursue performance truthfully or risk governance by illusion.
Ultimately, policymaking rooted in realism—anchored by independent, credible data—is not only more effective but also more sustainable. Just as in medicine, ignoring symptoms does not cure disease. It deepens it.
For More News And Analysis About Mozambique Follow Africa-Press
