Kinshasa’s double game in eastern DR Congo must have consequences

17
Kinshasa's double game in eastern DR Congo must have consequences
Kinshasa's double game in eastern DR Congo must have consequences

The New Times

Africa-Press – Rwanda. A new report by the United Nations Group of Experts exposing the Kinshasa regime’s continued reliance on the FDLR genocidal militia as a proxy force in the fight against the M23 rebels in eastern DR Congo is as troubling as unsurprising.

This cynical strategy not only undermines regional peace efforts but also casts a long shadow over the international community’s commitment to holding perpetrators of violence accountable.

The FDLR, a militia group founded by perpetrators of the Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda, has long been a source of instability in the region. Its inclusion in the fight against the M23 is a Faustian bargain.

This blatant disregard for international sanctions against the FDLR also exposes Kinshasa’s unserious approach to the Luanda peace process, a regional initiative aimed at de-escalating tensions that has since stalled.

It demonstrates a willingness to prioritize short-term military gains over long-term stability, a strategy guaranteed to backfire as they already have, on numerous occasions.

The international community cannot afford to be bystanders in this cynical game. Continued financial and military support for the Kinshasa government must be contingent on demonstrable progress towards peace. This includes a clear break with the FDLR and a genuine commitment to the Luanda peace process.

Turning a blind eye to the use of the FDLR not only condones past atrocities but also risks emboldening perpetrators. The international community must send a strong message: there is no tolerance for proxy wars fueled by genocidal militias.

The people of the eastern DRC deserve lasting peace. The path forward is clear: the Kinshasa government must abandon its use of the FDLR, and the international community must hold it accountable for its actions. Only then can a genuine and inclusive peace process take root, offering hope for a region ravaged by violence for far too long.

But is there a sign for hope? The report itself is short of concrete recommendations that may guarantee accountability on the part of Kinshasa, which has played flip-flop on the question of FDLR for the last two years.

Source: The New Times

For More News And Analysis About Rwanda Follow Africa-Press

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here