Africa-Press – South-Sudan. The English biologist has been widely seen as one of the most influential figures in human history due to his work on evolution, in which Darwin suggested that all species of life descended from common ancestors and evolved by natural selection.
Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution is considered a fundamental concept in science, but Dr Mike Sutton believes it is nothing but an insolent attempt to copycat the work of a fellow naturalist. In his upcoming book “Science Fraud: Darwin’s Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew’s Theory” he highlights similarities between Darwin’s “On The Origin of Species” and Matthew’s book “On Naval Timber and Arboriculture”.
It should be noted that claims of plagiarism have been made against Charles Darwin before, but Dr Sutton’s book contains what he calls new “evidence” of theft. For one, the author writes that Patrick Matthew’s brainchild was read and reviewed by Darwin’s friends and colleagues, while the famous biologist himself read at least five publications penned by Patrick Matthew. This contradicts statements made by Charles Darwin, who stated that he had not read any of the works by his fellow naturalist and suggested that neither he, nor apparently “any other naturalist had heard of Mr Matthew’s views”.
Another piece of “evidence” cited by Dr Mike Sutton is the letter Darwin’s wife Emma allegedly wrote to Patrick Matthew. In it she admits that the theory of evolution was his “original child”, but Darwin nurtured it “like his own”.
Commenting on the book, Professor Mark Griffiths, of Nottingham Trent University, said that the “evidence” presented by Dr Sutton “conclusively shows the theory of evolution was first proposed by Patrick Matthew”. “There is no good reason for Matthew not to be credited with being the originator of the theory”, Professor Griffiths said.
Incidentally, Patrick Matthew himself spoke about similarities between his book and the work of Charles Darwin in a letter published in the Gardener’s Chronicle. Darwin responded by admitting that his colleague “anticipated by many years the explanation which I have offered of the origin of species, under the name of natural selection”, but as mentioned earlier Darwin stressed that he and his colleagues were not aware of Matthew’s work. He offered apologies to the naturalist and promised to give credit to Matthew in the subsequent editions of his book, which Darwin did.
For More News And Analysis About South-Sudan Follow Africa-Press
