Osman Adam Shreef
Africa-Press – South-Sudan. The question of development has been shaped politically by the conflict between the regimes of governance, which hold power, and its opponents at different times, and by pursuing a developmental and colonizing act, which lays a course and an effective model of the cause of development independently from intersections and political instability.
The divergence of the cause of development has led to the reversal, weakness and fragility of the State & apos s structure, That make them dependence on aid and grants, which have resulted in the loss of identity and inheritance, which has resulted in the overall supply and absence of the cause of development, “social, cultural and political” by means of positive indicators for the sustainable development of the State for all generations so as to ensure the security and aspirations of society.
The historical impasse in the cause of development in the Sudanese experience has created interlinked problems by extorting the terms of reference, attempting to disrupt and destabilize these references between the parties to the ongoing political conflict over the various eras, after which it has left a stalemate for development in the Sudanese experience with the emergence of obstacles and retrospective manifestations, which have led to a flaw in the management of the Sudan & apos; s recent times of development.
Since the end of the colony, there has been a lack of national reconciliation, a lack of political consensus and a spread of the culture of exclusion, coupled with weak community structure, which has put the issue of development at a permanent historical predicament, following which historical problems in the Sudanese experience have left:
The creation of a vision of local development and its sustainability; local development has been an important location in the geographic and social studies, since the beginning of the reflection on this issue with the ends of the Second World War in 1945, where the currents of & quot; capitalism and socialism ” have addressed the local development potential of Henry Leiffer, Ernest Mandale, and the exploitation of the local economy has a prominent role to play.
The impasse in building a self-development model in the Sudanese experience; through the emergence of models of development in various countries by adopting, building on and sustaining self-resourced & quot; natural, human & quot; and by relying on an external party for its lack of capacity to finance development, through external partnerships and dealing with external parties as & quot; acronym & quot; in the process of self-development that contributes to the development of the Sudan & apos; long-frastructure model of self-spiration & quot.
The “Shalmers Johnson” model could be taken as its perception of the developmental State, which is based on economic development and is taking the necessary political measures to achieve this this objective, or the intervention of the State by guiding the development path, by means of projections by quoting a development model or a “development model” similar to which environmental assets and resources are compatible with the Sudanese situation.
One last point;
Development has gained a prominent place in political, economic and social life and has become a match for the growing concerns of different developed and developing countries. The concept of development is a complex and complex concept with its overlaps and multi-dimensional dimensions: ” Economic, social, political and cultural imperatives & quot; . Development is a process of economic transition from a to z relatively high level of progress and prestige within a time-bound framework.
For More News And Analysis About South-Sudan Follow Africa-Press
