Mozambican Lawyers Accuse Luanda Court of “Vetoing the Judiciary’S Mission”

1
Mozambican Lawyers Accuse Luanda Court of “Vetoing the Judiciary’S Mission”
Mozambican Lawyers Accuse Luanda Court of “Vetoing the Judiciary’S Mission”

Africa-Press – Angola. The Mozambican Bar Association (OAM) criticized the cancellation of the debate promoted by its Angolan counterpart on the electoral package, classifying the decision of the Luanda Court of Appeal as a “veto on the mission of the Angolan judiciary”.

“This pale decision is a veto to the mission of the Angolan judiciary, which cannot function as an ‘expedient system’, especially when the self-destruction of fundamental freedoms is at stake”, writes the OAM, in a statement.

At issue is the decision of the Court of Appeal of Luanda, which ordered the suspension of the National Dialogue on the Electoral Legislative Process in Angola, a debate scheduled for Thursday, ruling in favor of a group of six lawyers who claimed that the Angolan Bar Association (OAA) did not have the authority to promote this type of event.

“The suspension of the event in question represents an unacceptable setback in efforts to consolidate the rule of law and democracy in Angola and on the African continent in general.

The right to associate, debate and contribute to the improvement of a country’s legal system must be respected and encouraged, and not censored or silenced”, argue the Mozambican lawyers. The debate in question was intended to encourage “reflection on the electoral legislative package” that is being considered by the National Assembly, with various segments of civil society.

“The OAM expresses its strongest repudiation of this measure, as it understands that it constitutes a serious attack on freedom of expression, the autonomy of professional associations and the fundamental right to democratic debate on matters of public interest, such as the electoral legislative process.

In fact, the legislative power does not have a monopoly on legislative deepening, and this is also a function of responsible citizenship, as only democracy demands a lot from citizens.

Laws are the product of a democratic process”, he further describes. Participants in the debate included former OAA president Luis Paulo Monteiro, coordinator of the Angolan Social Political Observatory (OPSA), Sérgio Calundungo, coordinator of the Angolan Electoral Observatory, Luis Jimbo, activists Luaty Beirão and Cesaltina Cutaia, journalists such as Reginaldo Silva and Teixeira Cândido (former president of the union), television commentators Bali Chionga and José Pakisi Mendonça, and researchers Cesaltina Abreu and David Boio.

“The Mozambican Bar Association expresses its unconditional solidarity with the Angolan Bar Association, the organizers, speakers and participants expected at the event, encouraging them to persevere in their mission of defending democratic values, legality and social justice. Courage is needed in a profession in which freedom is its greatest ideology”, concludes the statement from the Mozambican lawyers.

The OAA also promised to file a complaint against the reporting judge “for violation of the duties of impartiality, reasonableness and respect for the constitutional limits of jurisdiction” and admits to appealing to the Constitutional Court “in view of the non-application of constitutional norms relating to fundamental freedoms and the statute of the Order.

For More News And Analysis About Angola Follow Africa-Press

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here